History Channel Hit Piece: Dirty Tricks,…
Malicious Lies & Journalistic Fraud
The real story behind Brad Davis, NBC, Popular Mechanics and the History Channel – media whore stooges who engaged in deliberate deception, manipulation and chicanery to please their corporate bosses
alex jones & Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
The History Channel 9/11 special that aired last night was by far the worst hit piece we have ever witnessed, a completely savage, dishonest and deceptive abomination, replete with dirty tricks, malicious lies and a level of journalistic fraud that goes way beyond simple bias.
Bradley Davis, the producer of the show, is a paid liar and a hit piece specialist who deceives people by gaining their confidence and then attacking them behind their back.
He is famous for the smear job documentary on Michael Jackson and makes a career out of conning people and then stabbing them in the back. His tongue is so smooth, that even the Loose Change crew were prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt on his impartiality before last night’s hit piece was aired, with Davis having tricked them into believing he was a friend.
Before filming began, Alex Jones asked Davis point blank if the documentary was going to be a hit piece, which Davis denied. After we brought attention to the History Channel’s blurb on their website, which clearly characterized the show as a hit piece, Davis panicked and promised to alter the promo, calling it a "misrepresentation," as well as re-edit the entire program to make it more balanced. The promo temporarily disappeared from the website and the broadcast of the show was put back by a week.
During the course of this second exchange, Davis again promised Jones that the show was not going to be a hit piece and was very upset that we had discovered he was behind the NBC hit piece on Jackson – seemingly frightened that his cover might be blown and his next victim would be alerted to his scheming tricks. He was terrified and kept repeating that he didn’t want to be quoted on anything he said.
Just like Popular Mechanics swore that their straw man smear job wouldn’t be a hit piece, Davis engaged in journalistic fraud and complete dishonesty by lying directly to Alex Jones’ face in claiming the documentary was to be neutral just so he could secure the interview.
Just like William Randolph Hearst, the progenitor of the term "yellow journalism," Davis will go down in history as a liar and a fraud.
The show itself was deliberately crafted, edited, shot and manipulated to portray the 9/11 truth movement in a completely negative light, while exalting the so-called experts to almost God-like status.
- The program makers pulled out all the stops to hire nationally renowned NBC news anchor Lester Holt (pictured) to narrate the show, a trusted voice that was utilized to brutally debunk 9/11 truth representatives.
- The debunkers, people like James Meigs whose scientific expertise stretches as far as being the editor of Video Review and Entertainment Weekly, were labeled as experts while real experts like Physicist Professor Steven Jones were stripped of any such description.
- The debunkers’ interviews were pristinely shot and framed, with beautiful backdrops and highly sympathetic camera angles and filters, whereas the truthers were shot from bizarre positions, their images were deliberately distorted and even the color filter of the shot had been manipulated to make their appearance look tainted, blurred and contorted. This was an intentional ploy and a crude act of manipulation to detract credibility from the truthers and violates all known ethical standards of journalism.
continue reading this article at prisonplanet.com
To popARF: Thx for the comment. Deserves a best answer vote.
I also watched that show just now on the history channel, which was said to be unbiased presenting both sides but all they did is make the "conspiracy" people (the people that are asking questions and raising points that go against the "official story") look EVIL and WRONG and that they DON’T RESPECT THE LOSS OF LIVES ON THAT DAY. WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS!
My 1st link below is to the article which explains how the history channel is back-pedaling from it’s description (but not changing the bias).
They left out MANY of good points that are in Loose Change as well as Zeitgeist. They also presented everything with a CONSPIRACY Response: followed by EXPERT’S Response….. With the footage they used basically it made it seem like: Here’s what the WRONG people say, Here’s what the RIGHT people say….
What they should’ve done, is established an unbiased Side A proposal then a Side B proposal.
They didn’t say anything about the sub-level explosions that went on in the basements of the trade center towers. They try to explain that FALLING DEBRI from the trade center towers FLEW across the way and hit trade center 7 starting fires! They also claimed that Silverstein (the owner of the trade center buildings) said that he decided to "pull it" and by that meaning pull out the people and firefighters (who says pull it? maybe evacuate? get everyone out?…. demolitionists say pull it is a well used phrase for initiating a demolition).
(3rd link below is the Loose Change video which raises many questions behind 9/11)
They didn’t reveal ANYTHING about the smell of Thermite (used in explosives) at ground zero, NOR did they say anything about the perfect straight cuts in the steal beams of the building (which demolitionists explain is exactly how you take down a building, by cutting it diagonally). My 2nd link below shows a picture of exactly what I’m talking about.
AND THEY DIDN’T SAY A SINGLE THING ABOUT THE VIDEOS TAKEN BY CAMERAS AT THE GAS-STATION / HOTEL ACROSS THE HIGHWAY LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SIDE THAT WAS HIT BY THE PENTAGON: WHICH WERE TAKEN AWAY BY GOVERNMENT SECRET SERVICE AGENTS! (which display much more than 1 frame per second which was what the government did release)
The history channel’s show 9/11 conspiracy theories was originally debunking 9/11 myths.
They also try to associate Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theorists" with people that don’t care about the lives lost on that day. They bring up some lady saying that says "Whenever people bring up these conspiracies… it’s like a knife being stabbed into my heart because they have no concern for the people that lost someone that day, or those that died" WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS. They do believe those people died, they do mourn their deaths, BUT they do not believe that it happened the way that we are being told!
Bottom line, they keep associating Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theory" believers with not caring about the people that died, or the people that lost someone….
Basically, they do reveal a lot of information but in the end, they try to say that all of the evidence brought to the attention by Loose Change, Webster Tarpley, and many many other professors and demolitionists is wrong, which it isn’t.
This is just the most recent and official version of government propaganda trying to say that the "official story"(original claim of how/why 9/11 happened) is correct.
Edit:
Also see 4th link about the molten steel / thermite!
http://www.infowars.net/articles/august2007/030807HistoryChannel.htm
http://chainsawsanders.com/howtocutasteelbeam.jpg
http://www.911weknow.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=24&Itemid=49
Also note:
like how the history channel kept showing the Pentagon collapse photos of the damaged area that did not collapse till 30 minutes later. They showed no photos of the initial 15 to 17 feet wide hole caused by the crash.
http://911lies.org/911_pentagon_attack_damage.jpg
Nor did they show the correct flight pattern of the airplane:
http://911lies.org/images2/fligh_path_pentagon_911.jpg
In the above link you will see:
The pilot passed up a clear direct frontal assault on his target.
He then passed through the air space of Reagan International. During this maneuver they dropped 7000 feet and by all reports did it like an ace fighter pilot.
Amazingly, the pilot managed maneuver the 757, through obstacles, attaining a flight level of 20 feet , in distance of about 1/4 mile, in order to strike the only wall of the entire Pentagon to be reinforced to withstand such an attack.
Popular Mechanics was pretty good at saying things were not true, just because they weren’t true.
Anyone that has researched 9/11 and the events would easily see how corporate tried to skew the view.
A short compilation of Kennedy’s speech,.. thanx to a keen youtuber i got rid of some really bad typo’s in the subbies. Enjoy,..